|
Story as the Heart of Language
So, here I am, not an anthropologist but an English major with twenty
books on brain theory and linguistics piled under my desk,
trying to distill a vast body of scientific inquiry and relate it to
my interest in story. The point that fascinates me from my foraging
is that human beings are biologically wired for verbal activity: we
have to tell stories! And it seems obvious that any skill embedded this
thoroughly into the biological structure of our brains deserves attention;
more than attention, it deserves preservation, study, and tending.
In terms of preservation, language teaches us without our having to
directly experience. Every other living thing must learn through direct
experience, which is much riskier. Baby bunnies and baby humans should
not play in the road. The bunnies who survive are the ones who figure
out how to hop out of the way at the sound or vibration of wheels. The
children who survive are the ones whose mothers effectively communicate
danger and watch over them until reasoning capacity sets in (which can
vary from age four to thirty). When my niece was still in preschool,
I remember squatting with her over the pancaked carcass of a dead rabbit,
driving home my point about why she should never run into the street.
In terms of study, language emotionally moves us to love and hate, and
can motivate us to change the whole course of our lives based on secondhand
information, hearsay, and example. This aspect of language has been
a blessing and a curse throughout history, and probably the source of
a lot of history itself! Language soothes or riles the heart, even if
we are not directly affected by the events or experiences recounted.
Simply hearing stories about other people can cause us to either embrace
or expel those people from our hearts and consideration. I was born
an American because the stories of the New World that filtered back
to Britain and Norway inspired my people to leave everything they knew,
their families, their countries, their languages, and their an-cestral
homes to seek new lives in a new land.
And in terms of tending, language can lift us beyond the borders of
our individual lives to imagine realities of other people, other times
and places; to empathize with other beings; to extend our supposing
far into the universe; to even imagine God. Through the power of words,
language expands the borders of our self-concept and places us in a
context and continuum of human experience. In just five to seven million
years our use of language has evolved from a survival technique to remind
us to get out of the road, to encompass and communicate our capacities
for contemplation, imagination, and the ecstasy of insight!
The
split that occurred in the course of our evolution from ape to human
is mirrored in the brain: we have two lobes, two ways of thinking, two
ways of processing language. And while the language center is located
in the left hemisphere, the capacity to generate poetry, art, and story
seems to be located in the right. We are cognitive/left-brained and
metaphoric/right-brained. Scientists, being cognitive, have focused
most of their study about language on brain theory and I, being creative,
have focused most of my study about story on experiential observation
and participation in its power to heal and motivate.
To my way of thinking, the ultimate aim is to be whole-brained: to take
in information and anchor it in narrative so that language fulfills
its amazing functions. Whole-brained responses create language patterns
that are associative. We take information and embed it in story and
we take story and embed it with information so that skills and information
can be passed from generation to generation, or from group to group.
This is automatic. It's how we teach children. It's how we socialize
the individual to the group. It's how we create culture.
And for most of human history, whole-brained learning has been how we
preserved and taught all the wisdom we accrued. Story and information
were chanted and drummed and danced around the fire. Decisions were
made within a spiritual context, and elaborate prayers and rituals accompanied
the counsel offered by elders and leaders. Only recently, in the rise
of the Euro-American culture, has this holistic modality split severely
in two, with intellect and science given more credence than story and
wisdom. We need both: the cognitive and the creative, the statement
and the story.
The Four Gifts
In serving as the heart of language, story imparts four distinct gifts.
Each of the descriptions of these gifts below is followed by a corresponding
chapter in the story of my Scottish sojourn.
-
Story creates context.
Context is the comprehension of what the story means. Context is
the lived experience of understanding that resides underneath the
spoken experience.
Context sets events in time and place. "Once upon a time..." or
"It was a dark and stormy night..." or "Last Tuesday after the ballgame..."
are all examples of context setting. Context verbally places us
in the world of the story. It opens the portal of imagination and
identification.
Rain
finally caught us in the Scottish valley. We hustled into the museum
café for tea, shaking off wet jackets. The sounds of passing
cars on the highway outside changed to that slick whine of tires
on wet pavement. Cupping cold hands around hot milky tea, we sipped,
ate scones, and read our educational brochures. We settled into
the shelter of the Kilmartin House to write in our journals while
dusk gathered around us. We would look up from time to time and
stare out into the valley, drawing the reality of the place into
our words. This is what we would take with us: the story we made
of this moment; the emotional sense of connection to the land, to
the people who walked here thousands of years ago depositing stones,
and to the people who left here hundreds of years ago depositing
themselves in America.
-
Context highlights relationship.
When context is set, the story starts happening to real people,
and the events in the story activate relationships. With or without
names, people in a story are identified by relationship: "I had
this friend...," "I knew this woman at work...," "My great aunt
Ellen...," "This little boy in Costa Rica..." are all examples of
identification by relationship to the speaker. Even if the characters
in the story are far removed, we begin to see them and to imagine
a relationship to them as well.
Only
when we got back to the B&B did we hear about the accident.
An American schoolteacher had been killed when a lorry going around
a curve had tipped over and crushed the man inside his rental car.
My traveling companion and I were busing around these backroads
because we had not trusted ourselves to drive in a country where
every instinct for left and right would have to be reversed. We
were shaken at this news. How far to come to die in another country,
body and metal twisted together. People came up to us in the pub
and said how sorry they were. We wondered aloud, "Where did he come
from? Was he traveling alone? Are there students who miss him tonight?
How will they inform his family? Is the lorry driver all right?"
We could not answer these questions and went to bed tenderly aware
of life's precariousness.
-
Context
and relationship change behavior and lead to holistic
and connected action. When story starts happening in a real scene
with real people involved we start putting ourselves into the story.
This is vicariousness, the human ability to imagine ourselves into
relationship with experiences that are not our own but are - through
story - able to inform, inspire, and activate us as though they
were direct experience. While we listen to such stories, we evaluate
the actions and reactions of the characters in the tale. We identify
with the person who behaves most like we would behave, or would
want to behave. We are critical of people who behave differently,
and learn from their experience: to anticipate and prepare ourselves
to behave well in a similar situation.
This part of Scotland is a series of small towns with a lot of rolling
pastureland in between. The next day we headed back toward Oban
on the local bus and listened as the local people got on and off
and talked amongst themselves. One woman knew the lorry driver's
cousin. Another woman was the neighbor of the ambulance driver.
Something had happened that stirred them more than usual. When the
accident occurred it had blocked both lanes of the highway and required
crews from several communities to clear the scene. A story began
to emerge: There was a woman who had been driving just behind the
schoolteacher's car. She skidded to a halt and ran toward the vehicles.
Without seeming to worry for her own safety, she checked on the
lorry driver, who was conscious and hanging securely in his seat
belt, then she eased her way into the squashed car and stayed with
the man until authorities arrived.
"The
man's dead," she told the constable, "but the lorry driver doesn't
seem too badly hurt." She gave the police the details of her witnessing
and asked that her name be kept private, except she wanted to know
how to contact the man's family. She wanted them to know he had
not died alone.
We
were the last off the bus when the driver turned and stopped us
for a moment. "You're Americans, aren't you?"
he said. "I know you didn't know the man, but I know the woman.
Her father died in a car wreck when he was vacationing in France
ten years ago. She made a vow that if God ever gave her the chance
to help a stranger, she would do what she wished had been done for
him - she'd be the arms of an angel."
-
Connected
action becomes a force for
restoring/restorying the world. When we come upon a story like this
one, or participate in a moment that has such rich potential to
teach us how to be better human beings, we want to pass it along.
We want the story to live, to outlive the participants. We are drawn
to our heroic nature, particularly to the private unsung moments
that are often our finest interactions. When these elements combine
into real scenes, real people, real inspiration, the personal becomes
universal - the characters lose their specificity and become everyman/everywoman.
Whether this story takes place in Scotland, or France, or India
doesn't really matter, because of course it has taken place everywhere
and forever. Like the story of the Good Samaritan, it is an archetypal
story that reminds us that the choice to be our best self is always
with us, waiting for that skid in the road.
So
the bus driver respected her privacy, but told us in parting, "I
dunna think she'd mind you tell the tale. It's what I'd wish myself,
wouldn't you?" We stood in silence a minute, each of us imagining
ourselves being the one who was held, being the one with the courage
and heart to hold. And as we exited the bus we made a vow - if ever
God gives us the chance to help a stranger, we will do what that
moment calls for, attempting to be the arms of an angel, in honor
of a lady in Scotland, in honor of her father, in honor of an unnamed
schoolteacher, in honor of putting goodness back into the world.
Tending Our Fire
Some of the people who left the hills and valleys of Great Britain ended
up in the hills and valleys of Kentucky and Tennessee in the southeastern
United States. They burrowed into the landscape to preserve a way of
life that honored their origins. The Appalachian hill folk kept their
Celtic dances and music and their southern drawl remained spiked with
brogue and burr. They made a variety of homemade whiskey and proudly
- sometimes violently - kept their clans.
At the onset of World War II, under an agency called the Tennessee Valley
Authority, the U.S.
government decided to provide electricity to southeastern rural America
by constructing a huge hydroelectric dam on the Tennessee River. Riding
on heightened patriotism and the need for defense, the agency pushed
the project forward with apparent populist support. The folks most deeply
affected, those whose valley would be logged and flooded and who would
be required to relocate from lands where they had subsisted for generations,
were enlisted to work on the project as a way of buying their cooperation.
In her book The Wild East: A Biography of the Great Smoky Mountains,
Margaret Lynn Brown writes, "TVA relocation experts emphasized the importance
of employment connections to speedy, cooperative removal. State and
county government officials actually provided TVA with lists of families
receiving public welfare..."
Brown later writes, "TVA targeted [the towns of] Bushnell, Judson, and
Almond first, because soon after the gates of the dam closed, all three
would be underwater. To achieve these removals, TVA exercised extraordinary
power of eminent domain... By statute, TVA could decide which lands
were needed, employ its own appraisers, and make a nonnegotiable offer
to landowners. If an owner refused to accept this onetime offer, his
property was condemned."
In its own way, the Fontana Dam is a version of a standing stone. In
an inflammatory atmosphere of threat, pressure, and red tape, the poor,
disrespected hill folk were worked hard and scattered. "As families
left and removed their homes, communities were reduced to unsightly
heaps of unwanted lumber and buildings and then burned by TVA clearance
crews." Like the hills and valleys of Scotland, change was coming to
the Tennessee River valley, and no one could stop it.
In one of these valleys where residents were required to move, everyone
had taken the government's offer and relocated except one old woman.
Whenever TVA officials or social welfare officers approached her cabin,
she chased them off with a burning brand lifted out of the fire she
kept in a pit in the dirt yard of her dilapidated cabin. To the officials,
the property didn't look like much, certainly not worth saving, but
they could not convince her to leave.
In a news report published in the Sylva Herald and Ruralite newspaper
in October 1943, such a situation was described to reporters: "There
is an old woman who lives back in the Proctor area,
two miles up in the cove, where it is impossible to take a car. She's
rather feeble. [Her son] said his mother had not been to Proctor in
forty years and had never been to Bryson City, twenty-five miles away.
She had never been in an automobile."
When officials expressed their dilemma to one of the woman's former
neighbors, he promised to help. "I know what to do. I'll go get her."
The man drove his tractor with a front loader onto the old woman's property,
scooped up the fire, and carried it down the valley to a relocation
site where he deposited the fire. Soon behind him came the woman pushing
a wheelbarrow with her worldly goods.
"What did you do?" asked the officials.
"Well, this woman is a keeper of the flame. That's been her family duty
in these hills for long as we remember. They kept the fire, made sure
it never went out, so we always knew where to get a new coal if we needed
it. She's the last. She'd never leave the fire."
In the misty hills of Scotland where this woman's family left the old
fire for the unknown, I wonder if this is what I came for - not the
stones but the spark. I came to get a coal from the hearth
because I needed to rekindle my dedication to the story, to the long,
long story that is older than anything we know. Once this understanding
starts to live in me I am ready to come home, to find my relocated people;
to take two stones, rub them together, make fire, and enter the story
again.
What
is the story you're tending, the one you'll never let be put out?
Let's
start there.
Tell me that story.
© 2007,
Christina Baldwin, All Rights Reserved
Excerpted from the book
Storyccatcher: Making Sense of Our Lives Through the Power and Practice
of Story © 2007 by Christina Baldwin. Printed with permission
of New World
Library, Novato, CA. or 800-972-6657 ext. 52. Storycatcher
is available for purchase now at your local bookseller, or by clicking
on the cover image above. |