|
|
| |
I LOVE TO MAKE NEW ACQUAINTANCES after they're dead.
I'm an obituary man. My favorites are those I think a friend of mine once told me he went to college with "Chris Rauschenberg, the son of the artist." That's about as close as I've come to knowing anything about the man (by name, anyway) until I read the Times' death narrative. Since it mentioned a 44 year-old London Sunday Telegram story hailing Mr. Rauschenberg as "the most important American artist since Jackson Pollock," I'm sure I've seen plenty of his work; I just can't say what or where. My enchantment with art is the same as my enchantment with anything else - the flight and sounds of birds I'll likely never know the name of, for instance. Just the other night I saw one of the most beautiful films about big love I've ever watched, and you could bribe me with a hundred foot massages and I still couldn't come up with the title. It's a wonder I can tell you Grandma Moses painted the Mona Lisa. Obviously
love of art is not knowledge of art. The kinship I enjoy with Mr.
Rauschenberg, therefore, emanates solely from whatever perspective
we share that transcends our worldly activities. And my understanding
of that perspective is limited to the contents of a single obituary
discovered during my regular scan of notables who've shed their need
for pockets. It's rather fitting when you think about it. Here's a grain of sand I found in Mr. Rauschenberg's obituary: a quote attributed to him that begins, "Anything you do will be an abuse of someone else aesthetics..." I feel my own myriad scars; I think of the leaders, wizards and Pooh-Bahs I've met or heard tell of; heck, I reflect on anybody with whom I've shared more than a handshake and it just seems that understanding and acting on the implications of that statement defines our peace of mind and our role in the world as much as any other single factor. Person, family, business, nation - it's all the same so far as I can tell. Living begins when we start our endless love affair with life's number one question: "Who will I/we be or die trying?" Its marrow is fire, the sacred passion deep within us to embrace the essential: Who will I be regardless of the chattering judgmental voices in my head and their cousins, the voices of society, including the people I revere the most... and fear the most?
Nietzsche said, "He who has a 'why' to live for can bear with almost
any 'how'." The truth of this statement is amply proven by stories
from concentration camps. But it also applies to those of us who journey
only through so-called ordinary life. What other than "purpose" or
"meaning" keeps adversity in any of its countless forms from overwhelming
us from time to time? And not someone else's reason, but our own. Which is why the ticket to misery is making choices that follow any voice other than the voice of our own inner heart. Learning to hear and be guided by that voice just may be the essence of life. Paramahansa Yogananda, in his Autobiography of a Yogi, one of the best-selling spiritual books of the past 100 years, writes that every life circumstance can be addressed effectively with the judicious use of a single question: Who am I? Buddhist tradition defines a "warrior" as one who has the courage to know oneself. Tibetan tradition calls a "warrior" one who faces his or her fears. Indeed, without a warrior's perseverance, quieting the small-self buzzings of limitation (those voices threatened, or "abused," by our innate passion for meaning) can feel like trying to hear a cricket at a Rolling Stones concert. My professional history has caused me to be asked on occasion, "What will it take for us to communicate effectively with the world?" Over the years, the first words out of my mouth have become, "Learn to manage fear." Eyebrows have been known to hit the skylight in response - "fear" being the most despised four-letter word in American business, if not everywhere. So I explain. For
individuals and institutions alike, the more we understand who we
are committed to being, and the more clearly and powerfully we communicate
that identity to the world, the easier it is for some people to reject
us, And it's no mystery why so much of Robert Rauschenberg's work does the opposite, likened as it is to a St. Bernard: uninhibited and mostly good natured. He seems to have been generally unfettered about offending anyone's esthetics, even his own. His perspective included:
© 2008 Steve Roberts
|
| |
| ABOUT THE AUTHOR
|